Kan Week #1—The Cost of Being Famous—Or, How Yeat Lost his Identity

When I first saw the theme of this quarter’s blog posts—Language and Identity—I knew I was going to somehow talk about some of my favorite artists. In this case, I am talking about Noah Olivier Smith, better known by his artist alias Yeat.

While in recent memory, Yeat may be known for his collaboration with LA-based singer-songwriter Joji on “Back Home,” in the early 2020s he was best known for his unique, almost meme-like identity and presence within the rap space. Often considered to be one of the proteges of the rage rap blueprint pioneered by Playboi Carti at the time, Yeat quickly developed his own distinctive style, built not just around his appearance, but also his unique lingo and lyricism.

For example, look at Yeat’s breakout track “Get Busy,” from his debut album Up 2 Me. In the span of around two and a half minutes, the Portland-based rapper utilizes his own invented slang such as “tizzy” or “twizzy” to add to his unconventional rhyme scheme. Furthermore, Yeat’s ability to write effective one-liners is on full display in this song—right as soon as he declares “this song already was turnt but here’s a bell,” bells begin ringing throughout the instrumental and for the rest of the song, adding to the line’s buzzing impact (1:28).



This pattern of clever one-liners and cheeky humor was one of the key factors in his ascension into the mainstream rap space. So, color me surprised when I listened to Yeat’s newest album, A Dangerous Lyfe, and found most of those elements absent from the vast majority of tracks. What remained were only cheap imitations of his older work: on the track “Taller,” he says towards an imaginary opponent “the sh*t you makin’ so *ss, we call it turd” (around 0:44). Like most of the track, this line feels lethargic. Numerous rappers have made this comparison in the past; there is nothing fresh, nothing unconventional, nothing unique about this bar clearly meant to recapture some facets of his old self. This issue is persistent throughout the album, so much so that it rid my enjoyment of the record.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LkU8vWPjArw

This begs the question: what could have changed in five years that seemingly stripped Yeat of the very things that made him popular in the first place? I believe this has to do with his desire to become the next culture-defining, world-unifying rapper. In order to generate a sound that has that effect, it needs to be able to cross boundaries and, put simply, be dumbed down enough for almost all to enjoy it. That is what I believe Yeat attempted to achieve with his new sound, which evidently failed miserably commercially and critically: it sold only 57,000 units, far less than his previous album Lyfestyle (with 89,000 units), and was panned by many critics (plus fans) to be a regression of his sound.

Seeing his recent “moderate success,” Yeat has started incorporating elements of his older sound into his recent music; however, whether he is able to regain his own identity will depend on the test of time. I guess we will be able to tell when his one-liners become playful once again.

 

Comments

  1. Pavan Sai SunkesulaSeptember 2, 2026 at 9:18 PM

    Hi Kan, I am not a fan of Yeat, so I appreciate the music video you embedded into your blog! It is interesting to see the “fall off” of celebrities and artists, in which you can celebrate their earlier work, but also see their degradation and how their newer work does not quite meet the same bar. It makes sense that Yeat was beloved by his fans since, in my opinion, people love to see originality in music and not just rehashed lyrics. In fact, that is one of the major criticisms of Drake, where many people say he uses too many ghostwriters or steals lyrics from other artists. Others say that he is merely paying homage to older rap artists and that anybody who criticizes him for that is indifferent when other artists, like Kendric Lamar, do the same thing. It is interesting to see how trying to become more popular actually ended up killing some of his popularity. In an attempt to be loved by everyone, he lost the love of his fans. You could say he “flew too close to the sun.” I will say though, part of the hate might just be from people from his “haterbase”, or the group of people who enjoy hating him. As artists continue to develop and grow, they are bound to find groups of people who dislike them publicly for the sake of disliking them. However, I will let you be the one to decide if that is the case since you are the one who is actually a fan of Yeat. It is nice to see that he is trying to make a comeback, but I think it will take a long time for Yeat to recover since fatigue of an artist can be detrimental to their fanbase.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Anirudh Week 1: An Analysis of the Modern Extension of Colonial Speech

Image
Image credit:  The Penn Review In his 1986 collection of essays Decolonising The Mind , Ngũgĩ wa Thiong'o posits that the greatest weapon of colonialism wasn’t the rifle. It wasn’t the cannon nor the gunboat. It was the weaponization of language. He vividly describes the systemic tactics colonial powers used to strip down the native tongues of colonized children in favor of English, severing the children’s connections to their cultures, identities, and even self-worth. And even though these colonial empires have collapsed, the inherent framework of identity erasure has been fundamentally upgraded. Today, the maxim of colonial erasure has been repackaged by the algorithms of Artificial Intelligence. Throughout the history of AI—whether we see it as a tool of objectivity or question it with suspicion—we cannot ignore that these systems are at their core built on data. Specifically however, they are built with massive datasets scraped from the Western, English-speaking internet. It is...
Read more

Sophie, Week #1 - Why Leitmotifs are Super Cool: Building Identity Through the Language of Music

Image
When I first saw the theme for this quarter’s blog submissions, I was actually super happy! You may be thinking that I’m nuts for being excited about an assignment, but I was. I knew that I would have the chance to talk about one of my favorite things in the whole world—leitmotifs! You’ve heard the word “motif” before, a repeated idea or symbol throughout a work of literature that helps to develop a broader theme. Leitmotifs are sort of like that, but instead of a repeated written idea, they’re repeated musical phrases used to represent different things. Here, I'll discuss how they can be an invaluable technique for developing a character’s identity within a musical. I’ll give some examples from one of my favorite musicals, Sondheim’s Into the Woods. In my opinion, the easiest leitmotif to grasp is something I think of as “The Royal Fanfare.” Basically, every time the princes come on stage, you hear a trumpet fanfare. S ounds pretty simple right? The princes enter; the fanfare pla...
Read more

Arya, Week #2 - Misogyny Will Never Die: How Language Subtly Perceives Women as Less

Image
Image credit: Rusi , “ Misogyny .” I have strong opinions on my femininity. Sure, I dress as a boy sometimes, but I still have a firm identity and sense of pride around being a woman. But society does not. At practically every corner and every step, there is something inherently more difficult about being a woman. Basically, every modern society has some sort of underlying sexism. Some of it is pretty obvious like women not being able to have credit cards (essentially financial freedom) until 1974 with the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, but other times it’s not.  There are small things like how the law of Coverture made women have no legal identity at all, even being called “legally dead”. The tradition of marriage creating one simply meant that the husband was the “one”, which isn’t nearly as romantic sounding as it is today. BBC adds that the male being the default gender–called generic masculine–creates a bias, which embeds itself into our psyche so much so that a gender neu...
Read more